Asics vs Brooks
What Running Shoe Brand is Better for You?
Foot comfort is the greatest requirement and satisfaction in the world of running.
Various manufacturers in the industry produce different shoes. (Thank you captain obvious).
With the rise in running shoe companies and different brands of running shoes, selecting the right pair of the shoe may be challenging.
In case you are wondering which shoe you should settle for, here are some quality features you should refer to while selecting.
Anecdotally, we break have several articles with in-depth analysis regarding a few of these two brands most popular shoes so that you can see which one makes more sense for you. See the links below:
- Asics Cumulus (18 & 19 editions) & Asics Gel Numbus (18 & 19 models ).
- Asics Cumulus 18 vs Gel Nimbus 18 (Even deeper review and comparisons)
- Brooks Adrenaline vs Ghost (complete comparison)
- Brooks Ghost 9 vs Glycerin (complete comparison)
- Brooks Adrenaline GTS (18 model) vs Ravenna (8 model) (complete comparison)
- Brooks Revel Review + Comprehensive Comparisons
- Brooks Adrenaline vs Asics Kayano (complete comparison)
- Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin (all versions/models)
- Books Addiction vs Beast (both version)
The Biggest Differences:
Brooks are widely known as having a larger toe box whereas Asics tend to have a snugger fit. The tightness you will find in Asics shoes are specific to the midfoot and heel areas of your foot. On the other hand, Brooks shoes recommend that you size-up a half a size (up on your dress shoes) when purchasing a pair. You will also notice that Asics offers a Fluidfit which helps support you foot through materials including elastic and mesh.
Over the last few years Brooks running shoes have started too close in on Asics running shoes.
Reason being, Brooks offers more stability. Apparently, different shoes work for different people.
For the longest time Asics was known for stability and interior comfort.
Over time Brooks has really made the interior of their shoes significantly softer than Asics (in my humble opinion).
Compared to the lightweight Asics, Brooks carries the heritage of high durability with a protective running shoe for many runners.
You will find it unresponsive and stiff whereas Asics only provides a decent feel of support.
Not to discourage you from considering Asics though, because it offers maximum support in the long run.
Based on my experience, I tend to get 300-400 miles out of my Asics Gel Nimbus.
My Brooks Ghost 9 are closer to 500 miles. In comparison, both have very durable material and the foundation of the shoe is shock absorbent - making your run very comfortable.
Heel-to-toe, both shoes offer a solid, comfortable running shoe for runners. I felts as if I have better traction and movement with Brooks over Asics.
Brooks running shoes provide a comforting, soft and smooth ride to neutral runners while Asics provides a quiet ride coupled with maximum protection from the rugged road for long runs.
After breaking the Brooks in, the are very responsive to what my needs are and were plush for a long period of time.
The arch support of the Asics seemed to be firmer than Brooks initially. When I was training for my first marathon I did it in Asics. Once I got closer to race day, I made the switch to Brooks.
Both shoes will offer you great comfort but concentrate on your running time.
A you a runner who likes long or short runs?
Depending on your answer to the number of hours you run, you can settle on either Brooks or Asics.
Both shoes provide maximum cushioning for your feet in that; Brooks and Asics running shoes brands feature mesh with no-sew overlays for complete structure that adds support to your toes and forefoot.
The Asics shoes are coupled with fluid- fit in on the upper interior to anchor your foot in place while Brooks has 3D compatible overlays printed on the top interior to provide complete structure and support to your toes just like in Asics.
Overall, both are VERY cushioned and comfortable to run in and the mesh and uppers are consistent on both - quality made.
Although both Brooks and Asics provide good support behind the heel, Asics has robust heel counter to firmly lock your heel down and anchor it in place as your sport.
Also, its midsole is coupled with sturdiness to offer you maximum midfoot cushioning.
Compared to Asics, Brooks has great midsole cushioning with additional super DNA to protect your feet from the rugged terrains or regular ground you may encounter as you run.
This DNA is specific to making sure you have enough support during runs on all terrains.
Meaning if you prefer a relatively soft ride, the Asics will be a better choice compared to Brooks.
However, this does not mean that Brooks running shoes will not offer you a smooth ride because like we earlier said, Brooks equally provide your feet excellent cushioning.
Keep in mind Brooks running shoes are perfect for neutral runners.
The exterior of you running shoes must be of significant consideration given that running involves a lot of terrains from smooth to rough transition.
The rubber outsoles of Asics and Brooks differ in a couple of ways; Asics features a primary traditional outsole with a rift of separation between the rear foot and forefoot whereas
Brooks has an outer sole that offers full anchor contact throughout your sporting activities.
You can, therefore, expect to receive a smoother transition from heel strike to toe-off when you wear Brooks compared to your sporting events in Asics.
But remember, both outsoles have designed horizontal flex grooves (solid foam) to assist in the extra flexibility of the shoes.
The shoes are stiff or firmer for women and at the same time they provide an equal amount of stiffness and flexibility.
I would look your gait, as this may impact the durability of the shoe. If you tend to wear out a certain part of shoes, buying either one of these might not solve your problem.
I don't believe a stride impacts the durability of the shoe as long
Well, some Asics is easier on the wallet than others, Whereas, looking at the Brooks website you can find a wide price-range too. Brooks rolls out some limited edition shoes where it is easy to drop $250+ on a pair.
Sometimes the even have specials not found anywhere else.
If you have the money and tend to buy shoes that are neutral, go for Brooks but if you are looking for a great value, consider purchasing Asics.
Both shoes work well for beginners and long distance runners.
Well both Brooks and Asics fit well, I switched from Asics to Brooks and will never go back and others have done the opposite. It's all personal preference.
Besides, Brooks offer her more stability and cushioning which prevents injuries on impact and gave me better balance compared to Asics. At the end of the day Brooks fit more comfortably to me.
I pointed out in my Brooks Revel review that the ankle cushioning was exceptional in my new pair. Something that I did not feel when I bought Gel Nimbus.
Conclusion: Asics vs Brooks
Answer: If you are shopping for a supportive racing shoe with a solid midsole that is relatively light weight and can offer you a smooth and soft ride, Brooks running shoes could be what you are looking for.
On the other hand, if you are looking for maximum cushioning while you run above anything else, coupled with excellent protection from the rough roads when enjoying your long runs, settle for Asics.
Each brand might be better for one runner over another.
The running shoe’s weight depends on its size. Some product lines of Asics are lighter than Brooks and vice versa.
So based on your preference and shoe size, select the right running shoe for yourself by carefully considering comfort.
The better cushioned may equate to the better shoe and cushioning for your feet.
Runners who are just getting into their training plans while breaking in their new shoes might have different thoughts as the shoe seems stiff.
That's a byproduct of the newness of the shoe not the training.
Heel-to-toe, you are getting a quality shoe regardless which one you choose. I think you will love either option, it's just a matter of which one you think fits your needs.